Saturday, October 6, 2012

Congressional analysts put 2012 deficit at $1.1 trillion, as GOP pounces - Fox News [ournewsa.blogspot.com]

Congressional analysts put 2012 deficit at $1.1 trillion, as GOP pounces - Fox News [ournewsa.blogspot.com]

EPISODE SYNOPSIS This week Ondi and Vlad are at Sundance talking with some of the most thought provoking doc makers of the festival. First, speaking with Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering from "The Invisible War," which sheds light on the endemic problem of sexual assault in the US military. The film has been shaking viewers into action with it's heart wrenching illumination of the great military shame of sexual violence in it's ranks. Then talking with Nonny De la Peña and examining the new frontier of experiencing news events through game platforms in her "immersive journalism" experience, "Hungry in LA." BYOD is then thrilled to get to talk with Eugene Jareki, this year's Sundance Grand Jury prize winner for his film, "The House I Live In." An engrossing an nuanced examination of the drug war, Jareki has once again opened eyes and set thoughts into motion with his latest probing achievement. GUEST BIOS Eugene Jarecki - is an award-winning dra matic and documentary filmmaker whose most recent film "The House I Live In" won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance 2012. This is his second time receiving the award, making him the only other documentary film maker besides Ondi to do so. He also won in 2005 for "Why We Fight". He is the recipient of numerous other awards and has received praise for many of his films all over the globe. Jarecki has been a guest on multiple national television programs such as The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Fox & Friends and Charlie Rose. In addition to ...

BYOD - 2012 Sundance Docs Pt.1 - Eugene Jarecki (The House I Live In) and Kirby Dick (The Invisible War)
Chávez has constantly ridiculed him as a majunche ("nobody") and a U.S. lackey. Foreign Minister Nicolás Maduro called him "queer," while government ministers have said that he is a right-wing reactionary. On Sunday, Oct. 7, however, Capriles's ... The Contest in Caracas - By Peter Wilson

A new estimate puts the deficit for the just-completed 2012 budget year at $ 1.1 trillion, the fourth straight year of trillion dollar deficits on President Obama's watch.

The result was a slight, $ 207 billion improvement from the 2011 deficit of $ 1.3 trillion.

The bleak figures from the Congressional Budget Office, while expected, add fodder for the heated presidential campaign, in which Obama's handling of the economy and the budget is a main topic. Friday's release came as the government announced that the unemployment rate dropped to 7.8 percent last month, matching the rate when Obama took office.

"President Obama once promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term, but ... he's broken that promise, and has presided over his fourth straight trillion-dollar budget deficit," said Republican vice presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan. "The President's reckless spending habits have burdened the American people with another $ 5.4 trillion in debt while failing to bring a real recovery for the 23 million Americans struggling for work or the 15 percent of Americans living in poverty."

The 2012 deficit was 7 percent of the size of the economy, an unsustainably high level. The figure is lower than the first three years of Obama's presidency, but higher than any other year since 1947.

The administration will release the official deficit numbers around mid-October, but they should line up closely with the CBO estimate, which showed that the government borrowed 31 cents for every dollar it spent.

The CBO estimate predicts a modest 3 percent increase over 2011 in both income tax and payroll tax receipts, reflecting the sluggish economic recovery. Corporate income tax receipts are way up -- almost 34 percent -- but most of that is a result of tax rules governing write-offs of business equipment.

Spending fell across a broad array of categories, the CBO said, but not Social Security and Medicare. Social Security payments rose by 6 percent, while Medicare grew by 3 percent, slightly less than in prior years.

Lower war costs meant a 3 percent decline in defense outlays, however, and the cost of unemployment benefits dropped 24 percent because fewer people have been receiving benefits recently. Medicaid costs dropped as well, because the federal government stopped paying a higher share of the program's costs.

Obama inherited an economy in recession and a deficit in excess of $ 1 trillion. He promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term, but deficits have instead remained at eye-popping levels, including a record $ 1.4 trillion deficit in 2009 and deficits of $ 1.3 trillion in each of the past two years.

In Wednesday night's debate, Obama said he has a budget plan to shave $ 4 trillion from the deficit over the coming decade, but he counts $ 1 trillion from savings already accomplished in budget deals with Republicans last year and $ 848 billion from winding down wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney promises to balance the budget within eight to 10 years, but hasn't illustrated how he would do so. His budget claims are suspect as well since he promises to cut the overall budget by about $ 500 billion in 2016 alone, while also promising to sharply boost military spending and restore more than $ 700 billion in Democratic cuts to Medicare over the coming decade. Romney has ruled out increasing taxes.

Congress is looking toward addressing the deficit at the end of the year, but any such effort would actually increase the deficit since lawmakers promise to restore most or all of Bush-era tax cuts that are set to expire Dec. 31. Lawmakers also want to head off $ 109 billion worth of automatic spending cuts set to hit the Pentagon and domestic programs in January. Republicans and Democrats disagree on whether part of the effort to replace this so-called sequester should include tax increases on upper-income earners.

Suggest Congressional analysts put 2012 deficit at .1 trillion, as GOP pounces - Fox News Topics


Question by Michael K: What was President Eisenhower's "New Look Policy"? What was President Eisenhower's "New Look Policy" and how did he change American Foreign policy overall in the 1950's. Give specific examples. This is one of my essay questions for my midterm tomorrow and I am terrible at history. I do not need to write a full essay, rather memorize a small paragraph that answers the question above Best answer for What was President Eisenhower's "New Look Policy"?:

Answer by redunicorn
Hope these sites help.

Answer by ammianus
It was Eisenhower's national security policy. It aimed to cut the high cost of defence by emphasizing nuclear weapons - both strategic and tactical - over conventional forces. The theory was that this would mean US defence policy rested on massive nuclear retaliation in the event of an attack on US itself or its allies,which would thus deter the Soviet Union from making any such attack in the first place.

[policy]

Top story: Scotland's most senior Catholic claims UK foreign policy is anti-Christian. Cardinal O'Brien says countries that persecute religious minorities should be denied financial assistance. In other news: a mother finds her toddler electrocuted by a plug and cable left by a handyman; the jury in the Malcolm Webster trial is told his first wife had possible traces of a sedative in her body; and in sport, it's been confirmed that Strathclyde police will brief players and managers of both Rangers and Celtic ahead of this weekend's league cup final. This is an international version that may have been edited for rights reasons.

Glasgow & West - Tuesday, March 15, 2011

0 comments:

Post a Comment