Romney, Obama both like Simpson-Bowles plan, to a point - Reuters [ournewsa.blogspot.com]
Question by Eric: What is the meaning of ""fair usage policy"" for Broadband Internet Connection? I am thinking of subscribing to a wi-max internet broadband connection recently. They will provide me with 256 kbps of bandwidth and unlimited amount of download . however this plan also says the unlimited option depends on Fair usage policy? anyone knows what that means? Best answer for What is the meaning of ""fair usage policy"" for Broadband Internet Connection?:
Answer by Jim
The "Fair Use Policy" in an ISP subscription is a limit on how much you can download during a certain time period. This time period might be a day, a week or a month, but it's very important that you find out. If the fair use policy limit is calculated each day, that means that as soon as you hit the download limit, your connection will be set to dial-up speeds for 24 hours. Fair use policies are a HUGE pain. Hughesnet uses them and they're the worst company out there. If your fair use policy limit is calculated each day, I strongly recommend you NOT use that company. You'll be shocked at how easy it is to reach the limit, and all of a sudden, in the middle of a project, you've got dial-up speeds.
Paul Ryan: We Are Seeing the Ugly Fruits of Obama's Foreign Policy Unravel on Our TV ScreensPaul Ryan: The Obama foreign policy is unraveling literally before our eyes on our TV screens. And so what Mitt Romney is going to do is lay out a very different vision for foreign policy. One, that is a policy of strength that I would articulate or claim the president's policy is one of weakness. We're seeing the ugly fruits of the Obama foreign policy unravel around the world on our TV screens.
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican hopeful Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama praised the deficit-cutting plan known as Simpson-Bowles at their debate on Wednesday, but neither has made the politically painful choices put forward by that scheme.
Both candidates held up the 2010 deficit panel's report as a model at the first debate in Denver, and Romney blasted Obama for not fully embracing the proposal, which seeks to pare the deficit, which has topped $ 1 trillion in recent years.
"The president should have grabbed that," Romney said at the debate in Denver, dominated by talk of fixing the economy and sparing over tax policies.
The deficit panel was named after its chairman former Republican Senator Alan Simpson and Democratic economic adviser Erskine Bowles, and in 2010 came up with a proposal to slash federal deficits and lower tax rates.
But the commission failed to reach the required votes to trigger a congressional vote and Obama never fully backed it. The plan called for about $ 3 in spending cuts for every $ 1 in new revenue to achieve its goals.
Romney, though, said he would "absolutely" not support raising revenue as a way to reduce the deficit.
"Simpson-Bowles tried to get at the deficit reduction by a mixture of revenue increases and spending cuts and Romney's plan is all on the expenditure side," said Howard Chernick, an economics professor at Hunter College in New York.
Obama, for his part, said his $ 4 trillion deficit reduction plan was based on Simpson-Bowles, but analysts might disagree with that characterization.
"Obama is closer to Simpson-Bowles although he wouldn't save money by cuts in major entitlements," Chernick said. "Obama does not want to go there."
Social programs known as "entitlements" include the popular Medicare health insurance plan for the elderly.
The Simpson-Bowles proposal cuts tax rates substantially for all income groups, while Obama has called for boosting rates for the richest Americans.
Simpson-Bowles also calls for slashing many popular tax deductions and adding them back only selectively.
Neither candidate has gotten very specific about which of the nearly $ 1.1 trillion in annual special tax breaks they would hit to balance the budget. Among these are the mortgage interest deduction and the tax break for charitable giving.
"That is how the commission, the bipartisan commission that talked about how we should move forward, in a balanced way with some revenue and some spending cuts," Obama said.
(Editing by Alistair Bell and Eric Walsh)
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Policy Matters -- 7th Sept 2012 - Balochistan -- Security & Worsened SituationShow Your Support & Subscribe To Our Channel, Click On Link Below To Subscribe: bit.ly We Pride Ourselves With Providing You With FULL PROGRAMS ONLY, No Multiple Split Files, No Messy Uploads or Missing Parts For Updates Follow Us on Facebook & Twitter Like Our Facebook Page, To Show Unity Against Status-Quo www.facebook.com Follow Us on Twitter for All Latest Upload & Updates twitter.com Subscribe for all the latest updates on Pakistani Current Affairs, Politics, Politicians, News Anchors & Talk Shows. Don't forget to Comment & Like the video Subscribe Now: bit.ly
0 comments:
Post a Comment