3rd victim dies in VFW shooting in central Florida - Seattle Post Intelligencer [ournewsa.blogspot.com]
No End In SightA comprehensive look at the Bush Administration's conduct of the Iraq war and its occupation of the country. MPAA Rating: NOTRATED
In normal circumstances, the Federal Reserve implements monetary policy through its influence on short-term interest rates, which in turn affect other interest rates and asset prices.1 Generally, if economic weakness is the primary concern, the Fed ... Bernanke: Five questions about the Federal Reserve and monetary policy
WINTER SPRINGS, Fla. (AP) â€" All three members of a motorcycle club who were shot outside a Veterans of Foreign Wars post in central Florida have died.
Winter Springs police reported that Dave Jakiela died Tuesday, two days after being hospitalized. He was shot Sunday morning as members of a chapter of the Warlocks motorcycle club were meeting at the VFW for a charity ride. Also killed in the gunfire were Harold Liddle and Peter Schlette.
The gunfire erupted after other bikers showed up, Winter Springs police reported. Police officers responded and confiscated multiple weapons.
Victor Amaro, Robert Eckert, David Maloney and Paul Smith were each charged with two counts of homicide and one count of attempted homicide. Police expect to upgrade the attempted homicide in light of the third death. All four men were being held without bail.
The Orlando Sentinel (http://thesent.nl/SBn6WI ) reports that the Warlocks were founded in Orange County in the late 1960s by Navy veteran Tom "Grub" Freeland. The club now has chapters throughout the U.S., England and Germany.
Members of the Pennsylvania Warlocks motorcycle club came to Florida to establish a chapter in Seminole County earlier this year but are not associated with the Florida Warlocks. According to records, the four men who were charged in the shooting are associated with the Pennsylvania club.
The FBI and DEA are assisting Winter Springs Police in the investigation. They are all still trying to determine a motive.
___
Information from: Orlando (Fla.) Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com
More 3rd victim dies in VFW shooting in central Florida - Seattle Post Intelligencer Topics Question by Obama's Hardworking 47%: Why is abortion so acceptable but not a "one-baby per couple policy"? Both policies "limit" the number of babies born but one policy is "more correct"? Best answer for Why is abortion so acceptable but not a "one-baby per couple policy"?:
Answer by StephenG
Abortion is legal get a life
Answer by Albee
A liberal's genetic material is considered toxic trash and they should be prohibited from passing it along. For liberals, a zero-offspring law would be appropriate.
Answer by Demonrat
Did you now that its Momo the illegal alien who works for Yahoo who always attacks Jews here on a daily basis? She is a member of A z t l a n.net a website that constantly preaches hatred toward White People and Jews. You probably thought it was a Muslim who was posting that. Nope it was an illegal alien and yep she works for Yahoo. You know her its Momo. Source(s): Notice that this question was blocked. Its her who blocked it.
Answer by Christian Null
Abortion is a choice if the gov made a 1 baby per couple law... I'd might become an "terrorist" to fight agenst the oppression
Answer by just visiting
abortion is unacceptable, just as one baby per couple is unaceptable if the unborn could vote, do you think obama would change his pro abortion views?
Answer by Lois Griffin
because one involves choice and the other involves lack of choice. and the U.S. population isn't quite near China's and India's. Plus we have a lot of land to spread out our population. Not to say that over-population isn't a problem but we can still function at this point.
Answer by callawak2
One forces the policy on you the other allows you to decide what may be in the best interest of the parents and the child. However, with the growing cash short fall and not enough people in the younger generation to fund things, the policy should be for the sake of national interest to force people to have at least 3-7 kids per family. Of course that is based on looking at the logic point of the question differently. We need more people to fund our retirements, and they will to some day. Face it the stock market alone is not going to do it. So the 1 baby rule is not good policy.
Answer by bash
Because Mitt Romney said that he "would never waiver" on his pro choice stance after his aunt was killed in a botched, back alley abortion.
Answer by mom
Most people are happier with things when they make their own decisions. Som e people don't want kids at all, some have a definite number they want and others just let nature take it's course. Most abortions have little to do with birth control.
Answer by Mr. Smartypants
They are totally different policies, totally unrelated. In the US we have always believed that anyone had the right to have as many babies as they wanted. We don't even tell poor people they can't have babies if they can't afford them. Even mentally ill people have the right to have babies. Nobody has ever suggested in the US that we limit the number of children anyone can have, that's just totally against the way we think. Abortion is a little more controversial. 8^) Its dressed up as a religious issue but its not really, it's a political issue masquerading as a religious or 'moral' issue. The GOP has built it into a major wedge issue, they picked the terms in which it would be discussed, etc. In fact before 1980 the Pro Life movement was almost entirely Roman Catholic. It only became an issue for Protestants in the 1980 election, part of Reagan's campaign. But the Republicans never intended to actually reverse Roe v. Wade, they wanted to maximize the political mileage they could get on the issue. Which by now they about have, so it's no longer as big an issue as it was 20 years ago. In fact, -because- its framed as a political issue, not a religious issue, it can never really be resolved. We can never really talk about it in real terms, just political slogans about 'abortions' and 'baby killers', and how women use abortion as a primary method of birth control. The issue has been framed in polarizing political terms so it can't even be discussed rationally--just like the 'Ground Zero Mosque' and Obama's birth certificate.
Answer by Rollingliketumble
Abortion allows a person to exercise their reproductive freedom. It allows them to decide whether or not they're ready to have that child at that time. A one child policy is not reproductive freedom. It forces a person to only have one child.
The Policy - Seven Nation ArmyClayton up for his first live performance!!
0 comments:
Post a Comment