For Obama, Romney, final debate is pivotal - Washington Post [ournewsa.blogspot.com]
Question by Carlosfestivo: What was the "New Economic Policy" of Great Britain in the colonies? Best answer for What was the "New Economic Policy" of Great Britain in the colonies?:
Answer by Jill Y
I think the downfall of the British Empire has raised the eyebrows of many economic elite from all over the world. For instance, during the returning of Hong Kong to China, a big piece chunk of beef which has made many British in Hong Kong became super rich by doing nothing in this tiny city. The British partly owned the HSBC and Pacific Centre in the Central of Hong Kong has raised the rent to a peak and its damned Links made many small business closed in HK for not many could afford the rent hike to a double or triple folds within two to three years period. Many local citizens say that the British sucks. The British " New Economic policy" probably relies on sort of so called Development by expanding the construction projects, raising taxes or sales and services taxes, investment taxes, rental and real estate transaction taxes. That´ s what the British can do. There are not many British colonies remaining and many have successfully sought for Independence in the past two decades. However, many still remaining as the British Common Wealth. I guess British has the Cayman Island only, the most expensive city to live in this world. You can find your answer in detail by visiting the following website. What is new economic policies of UK addressed to the remaining colonies? http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu9M2xqxJPPoA3gZXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTBybnZlZnRlBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkAw--/SIG=122714njo/EXP=1236146102/**http%3a//www.cgdev.org/files/4371_file_WP_70.pdf
inFamous 2 - 39 - Cole VS NixSie will es wirklich wissen. All commented copyrighted/tredemarked media is owned by their respective companies and persons. Videos uploaded are commentary in nature,as defined under the 'Fair use' policy of copyright. I do not use it to make any kind of profit. Alle hier gezeigten kommentierten Materiallen und Markenzeichen sind Eigentum der entsprechenden Urheber. Dieses Material dient ausschließlich der kreativen Kommunikation und ich schlage keinerlei Profit daraus.
However else Campaign 2012 is chronicled, there is little doubt it will be remembered as the Year of Debates. Never have candidate debates played as important a role, from the start of the Republican primaries through the general election, as they have in this election.
Debates shaped the Republican presidential field during the fall of 2011 and played a critical role in determining the outcome of that contest last winter. Ask Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum about that. The general election debates have shaken up the race and last week provided the most confrontational encounter of the modern era of presidential politics. Monday’s final debate could help decide who wins the election two weeks from Tuesday.
President Obama and challenger Mitt Romney travel for that encounter to Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla. Foreign policy is the topic of the 90-minute session hosted by CBS’s Bob Schieffer, but the debate will be far more than a discussion of world events. After their verbal brawl at Hofstra University on Tuesday, Obama and Romney have a few more scores to settle â€" and some cleaning up to do. They know that this will be their last opportunity to make or change impressions before a national television audience that once again could top 60 million people.
It’s likely both will be urged to throttle back from the heat of their second debate. After his listless performance in Denver, Obama had to prove to his base that he was willing to fight to retain his job and challenge what he said were Romney’s misstatements about his own and the president’s policies. Obama did that, and more, and may need to find a cruising speed somewhat short of that Monday to project a presidential demeanor.
Romney overwhelmed Obama at their first debate, changing the trajectory of the campaign and boosting Republicans’ enthusiasm level. But at Hofstra, challenged constantly by the president, he appeared peevish and testy â€" interrupting the president and peppering him with questions. Whatever progress he may have made in the first debate in projecting a more likable personality may have been set back in the second. He, too, needs to find the proper balance on Monday.
At the Alfred E. Smith dinner in New York last Thursday night, Obama joked about his performance in Denver. “Some of you may have noticed, I had a lot more energy in our second debate,†he said. “I felt really well rested after the nice long nap I had in the first debate.â€
That got a good laugh, but Monday is all serious business for both candidates. Obama has gotten generally good marks from the public for his handling of foreign policy, including ending the war in Iraq and setting a course for ending the war in Afghanistan, but has drawn sharp criticism from Romney on a range of foreign policy issues. The GOP challenger, meanwhile, has a mixed track record at best of driving those criticisms home.
Romney has attacked Obama over Iran and Israel. He’s questioned how the administration has dealt with the uprisings in the Middle East. He’s taken issue with the president over the war in Afghanistan and has been critical of the administration’s policies on Russia and China. He has taken the president to task over defense spending.
Related For Obama, Romney, final debate is pivotal - Washington Post Articles
0 comments:
Post a Comment